RSS Feed

a playground of art, photos, videos, writing, music, life

 


You are here







Random Quote

Every author in some way portrays himself in his works, even if it be against his will.
-- Goethe


 

Blog - Blog Archive by Month - Blog Archive by Tag - Search Blog and Comments

<-- Go to Previous Page

The, Um, Smartest Woman in the World

 

Back in August, I said that "Clinton is too smart to blow a [double-digit] lead that big with her own gaffe."

I gave her too much credit, as she has emerged as a sock puppeteer. Here's the Wikipedia definition, with minor editing:

A sockpuppet is an identity used for purposes of deception within a community. In its earliest usage, a sockpuppet was a false identity through which a member of a community speaks while pretending not to, like a puppeteer manipulating a hand puppet.

The key difference between a sockpuppet and a regular pseudonym is the pretence that the puppet is a third party who is not affiliated with the puppeteer.

In this case, a young woman's sincere question was not adequate. Instead, Hillary stuck her hand up the woman's body and uttered the question for which Hillary was prepared.
A senior Clinton staffer asked if she'd like to ask the senator a question after an energy speech the Democratic presidential hopeful gave in Newton, Iowa, on November 6.

"I sort of thought about it, and I said 'Yeah, can I ask how her energy plan compares to the other candidates' energy plans?'" Gallo-Chasanoff said.

"'I don't think that's a good idea," the staffer said, according to Gallo-Chasanoff, "because I don't know how familiar she is with their plans."

He then opened a binder to a page that, according to Gallo-Chasanoff, had about eight questions on it.

"The top one was planned specifically for a college student," she added. " It said 'college student' in brackets and then the question."

Topping that sheet of paper was the following: "As a young person, I'm worried about the long-term effects of global warming. How does your plan combat climate change?"

And while she said she would have rather used her own question, Gallo-Chasanoff said she generally didn't have a problem asking the campaign's because she "likes to be agreeable," adding that since she told the staffer she'd ask their pre-typed question she "didn't want to go back on [her] word."

So much for supporting a woman's right to free speech.

Hillary is weak. She can't handle anything but easy, pre-selected questions from anyone. Any variation from the script is not a "good idea," whether it's Tim Russert or 19-year-old Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff.

We like need our presidents to be strong. "Don't hit me, I'm a girl" is not a winning campaign strategy, and she's an idiot to try this stuff.

The Democratic nomination is again up for grabs.

ETC: Yep - she's toast. This is gaining momentum.

This would never be said about a man. There is no way feminists will support her now, unless she puts this firmly and finally to bed, and quickly. And frankly, I don't think she's up to it. Which is a shame. Women deserve a better representative than Hillary.

MORE ETC: And noted feminist Camille Paglia weighs in...

Hillary's stonewalling evasions and mercurial, soulless self-positionings have been going on since her first run for the U.S. Senate from New York, a state she had never lived in and knew virtually nothing about. The liberal Northeastern media were criminally complicit in enabling her queenlike, content-free "listening tour," where she took no hard questions and where her staff and security people (including her government-supplied Secret Service detail) staged events stocked with vetted sympathizers, and where they ensured that no protesters would ever come within camera range.

That compulsive micromanagement, ultimately emanating from Hillary herself, has come back to haunt her in her dismaying inability to field complex unscripted questions in a public forum. The presidential sweepstakes are too harsh an arena for tenderfoot novices. Hillary's much-vaunted "experience" has evidently not extended to the dynamic give-and-take of authentic debate. The mild challenges she has faced would be pitiful indeed by British standards, which favor a caustic style of witty put-downs that draw applause and gales of laughter in the House of Commons. Women had better toughen up if they aspire to be commander in chief.

She titles the piece "Queen Hillary's disruptive court" and then subtitles it: "The press corps finally wakes up to her waffling and evasions."

And hopefully, America too.

 


Tags: politics
by Brett Rogers, 11/13/2007 10:37:52 AM
Permalink


Comments

This is why it's foolish to vote for ANYONE just because of some key demographic quality such as gender or race. "Wolf warned" by whom? Hillary's campaign staff? Shame on them - let your candidate take the heat, or allow them to prove that they're incompetent to do so. Besides, since when is pressing a candidate to actually answer a question considered a "character attack"? Women don't just deserve better than Hillary - this whole nation deserves better. ~ Janet (PS - didn't we just get done bashing FEMA or someone for planting questions during a press conference? It's interesting to see the Dem's spin Hillary's audience plants in light of that.)

 

 

Posted by Janet (dmweblifeblog@yahoo.com), 11/13/2007 12:22:46 PM


This pretty much sums up her entire political career. I find it HILARIOUS that the "Clintonistas" (as Rush calls them) are now going after the media for asking legitimate questions. I'm going to enjoy watching her with the heat applied.

As for picking on the "girl" I say BS. She's got more testicles in her lockbox than the Dallas Cowboys locker room.

 

 

Posted by Pale Rider, 11/13/2007 1:33:18 PM


Spot on, both of you...

No presidential candidate does themselves any favors trying to play the victim. "Victim" is not the face of America. It's unelectable.

And with the remaining players in the Dem nominee race, with the war in Iraq going very well, how do they climb out of that bag of defeatist crap in the general election?

Can you say President Romney?

 

 

Posted by Brett Rogers (http://www.beatcanvas.com), 11/13/2007 1:40:39 PM



Add Your Comment:
Name (required):
Web Site:
Remember Me:   
Content: (4000 chars remaining)
To prevent spammers from commenting, please give a one-word answer to the following trivia question:

If you're very sick, what medical professional would you go to see about it?